Ayodhya case rules the roost by becoming the darkest spot in history: Jamiat

Must Read

18 nurses at Pune have tested positive for COVID-19

Eighteen nurses at a private hospital in Pune have been tested positive for COVID - 19 on April 18....

Coronavirus case in the Rashtrapati Bhavan

Nearly 100 people have been quarantined at the Rashtrapati Bhavan complex. This is after a sanitation worker there tested...

The Indian Army said that troops returning from leave or outposts are to report to screening centres.

The Northern Command of the Army has asked its troops that people who are returning from leave or outstation...

Highlights

  • The JUH committee that met on on Thursday adopted a resolution by describing the Ayodhya case verdict as the darkest spot in history of independent India.
  • They also stated that the party won’t file a review petition as there was possibility of further destruction.

The Jamiat-Ulama-i-Hind led by Maulana Mahmoud Madani has made a decision of not filing a review petition on the judgement of Supreme Court in RamaJanmabhoomi-Babri Masjid Case.

Earlier, the Party under the leadership of Senior Deoband teacher Maulana Arshad Madani had made decision of filing a review petition within a month.

The Madani faction of Jamiat was in oppose of filing a petition as they thought that their move will have negative impact. They had put forth the demand to open and allow Muslims to offer prayers in mosques under the control of ASI(Archaeological Survey of India).

The Jamiat resolution adopted on Thursday states,”The working committee of Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind holds the recent Supreme Court verdict on RamJanmabhoomi-Babri Masjid unjust and one-sided. It has confirmed that mosque wasn’t built after demolishing any temple but there was mosque for several years before it was demolished in 1992.

As such the judgement is the darkest spot in the history of Independent India. In such a situation we cannot expect any better award from the judges. Rather, there is a possibility of further damage.

The Supreme Court had delivered the verdict on the case that had been pending since several decades on November 9, when it gave 2.77 acre land for the construction of Ram Mandir, and 5-acre land for building Babri Masjid at any location in Ayodhya.

The verdict was given in the favor of Hindus, even after admitting the fact that act of placing idols at the site in 1949 was desecration and after stating that there was no evidence to prove the existence of temple before Babri Masjid.

The resolution also criticized Sunni Waqf Board by saying that it had played the role of Mir Jafar-the commander of Nawab of Bengal, who betrayed him in the Battle of Plassey in 1757.

- Advertisement -

1 COMMENT

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisement -

Latest News

18 nurses at Pune have tested positive for COVID-19

Eighteen nurses at a private hospital in Pune have been tested positive for COVID - 19 on April 18....

Coronavirus case in the Rashtrapati Bhavan

Nearly 100 people have been quarantined at the Rashtrapati Bhavan complex. This is after a sanitation worker there tested positive for the Coronavirus.The person...

The Indian Army said that troops returning from leave or outposts are to report to screening centres.

The Northern Command of the Army has asked its troops that people who are returning from leave or outstation duties are to report directly...

Twinkle Khanna tweets her Simpsons Avatar

Twinkle Khanna is an actor turned entrepreneur. She has been true to her username Mrs Funnybones. Humour is never lost. She is one of...

Government says 11933 cases but no community transmission

The confirmed coronavirus cases in India have hit 11933 cases. The global tally of the infection has crossed the 2 million mark.India has reported...
- Advertisement -

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -